Modeling and simulation methods for efficient and full system characterization

Very fast and efficient modeling and simulation methods for mixed-signal systems like the CP-PLL

General diagram block of a charge-pump PLL system.
© Fraunhofer ENAS
General diagram block of a charge-pump PLL system.
Concept of the event-driven modeling and simulation.
© Fraunhofer ENAS
Concept of the event-driven modeling and simulation.
Excellent matching between the event-driven and the transistor level simulations.
© Fraunhofer ENAS
Excellent matching between the event-driven and the transistor level simulations.

Introduction

The CP-PLL is an integrated mixed-signal circuit and is used in modern systems like mobile phone and wireless internet access. Since a CP-PLL used for frequency synthesis has a mixed-signal architecture, it is difficult to use general theory to characterize its nonlinear behavior and challenging to achieve a robust system design. Therefore, linear models and simulations are used. The disadvantages are the limited validity, the a priori approximation and the long simulation time. Thus, it is necessary to use a more time-efficient modeling approach to consider nonideal and nonlinear effects.

 

Event-driven modeling

The Event-Driven (ED) model is based on the phase information of the reference and feedback signal of the PLL. Only when a rising edge triggers the PFD, the loop responds to the phase error. Thus, it is sufficient to calculate all PLL-states at the triggering events only. These calculation steps correspond to an iterative algorithm allowing to model an arbitrary ordered Fractional-N and Integer-N PLL including nonlinear and nonideal effects.

 

Event-driven vs. transistor level

To validate the enhanced ED model, first the PLL components are characterized separately based on Transistor Level (TL) simulations. The resulting nonlinear and nonideal characteristics are then included in the ED model. Afterwards the PLL behavior is simulated using both the ED model and the TL platform and results are shown. Both simulations are very similar. The difference between both has its maximum within the locking process where the CP-PLL exhibit a chaotic behavior. After locking the difference converges to zero. Although the ED model is nearly as accurate as the TL platform, the simulation time is highly decreased (see table).
By using this model the characterization and design considering nonlinear and nonideal effects can be done very efficiently. Additionally, Monte-Carlo-Simulations become very time-efficient.

 

Conclusion

To obtain a very time-efficient simulation methodology for mixed-signal systems, the PLL components are characterized separately based on TL simulations and macroscopically included into the ED model. The comparison of the TL model and the ED approach shows that both simulation results are very similar. Thereby the ED model is applicable to consider nonlinear and nonideal effects. Additionally, it is shown that the ED technique is a very time and computer resource-efficient approach due to speed-up factors up to 10000 compared to TL simulations. Thus, this ED model can be used to efficiently characterize and design mixed-signal systems considering nonlinear and nonideal effects.